News Ticker

Japan’s ‘Peace Constitution’ Under Pressure at 70

Japan's American-written "peace constitution" has survived unchanged for 70 years, but nationalists seeking an overhaul are gearing up for a major new push as concerns grow over North Korean belligerence (AFP Photo/Toru YAMANAKA )

Japan’s American-written “peace constitution” has survived unchanged for 70 years, but nationalists seeking an overhaul are gearing up for a major new push as concerns grow over North Korean belligerence (AFP Photo/Toru YAMANAKA )

Tokyo (AFP) – Kelly Olsen reports: Japan’s American-written “peace constitution” has survived unchanged for 70 years, but nationalists seeking an overhaul are gearing up for a major new push as concerns grow over North Korean belligerence.

Conservatives have long called for the document they see as a national humiliation to be amended, but current political alignments and growing security concerns suggest they now have their best chance of success.

“The time is ripe,” Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said Monday in a speech to supporters of change. “We will take a historic step towards the major goal of revising the constitution in this milestone year.”

The constitution, which took effect 70 years ago on Wednesday, renounced Japan’s sovereign right to wage war. It has been championed by progressives as a pacifist symbol born out of the country’s World War II defeat.

Supporters argue the document is a bulwark against any repeat of Japan’s World War II aggression, and warn attempts to revise it risk whitewashing the country’s modern history.

Public opinion polling shows broad acceptance of the document, widely known as the "peace constitution," as a whole, although views are divided on the hot-button issue of Article 9 -- which renonces Japan's right to wage war Public opinion polling shows broad acceptance of the document, widely known as the "peace constitution," as a whole, although views are divided on the hot-button issue of Article 9 -- which renonces Japan's right to wage war (AFP Photo/Toru YAMANAKA )

Public opinion polling shows broad acceptance of the document, widely known as the “peace constitution,” as a whole, although views are divided on the hot-button issue of Article 9 — which renonces Japan’s right to wage war Public opinion polling shows broad acceptance of the document, widely known as the “peace constitution,” as a whole, although views are divided on the hot-button issue of Article 9 — which renonces Japan’s right to wage war (AFP Photo/Toru YAMANAKA )

But nationalists deride it as an alien charter forced on the country by an occupying power — the United States — bent on imposing its own Western values.

And they see those who defend its emphasis on peace as dangerously out of tune with geopolitical realities, such as North Korea’s nuclear and missile programmes.

“The fault lines of Japanese politics very much run through the constitution,” said Kenneth Ruoff, professor of modern Japanese history at Portland State University in the United States.

Abe has long vowed to bring it more in line with what conservatives see as Japanese values, such as greater emphasis on obligations rather than rights, and on the family not the individual.

Japan on May 1 dispatched its biggest warship since World War II to protect a US supply ship, one of the country's military roles expanded under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, as tensions mount in the region over North Korea Japan on May 1 dispatched its biggest warship since World War II to protect a US supply ship, one of the country's military roles expanded under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, as tensions mount in the region over North Korea (AFP Photo/STR)

Japan on May 1 dispatched its biggest warship since World War II to protect a US supply ship, one of the country’s military roles expanded under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, as tensions mount in the region over North Korea Japan on May 1 dispatched its biggest warship since World War II to protect a US supply ship, one of the country’s military roles expanded under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, as tensions mount in the region over North Korea (AFP Photo/STR)

While unlikely to seek the complete removal of the popular and war-renouncing Article 9, they advocate changes to its wording, such as recognising the country’s self-defence forces as a military and clarifying Japan’s right to defend itself.

Pro-amendment parties can now muster the two-thirds majorities necessary in both houses of parliament to pass changes, though they would be subject to a national referendum for final approval and that is seen as the biggest hurdle.

— Public support? —

The constitution has never been amended, but governments such as Abe’s have interpreted it in ways that have effectively loosened some of its constraints.

In 2015, for example, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and its allies rammed legislation through parliament enabling Japan to engage in “collective security” — the defence of troops from its US ally and other friendly nations — if it was seriously threatened … (read more)

via yahoo.com/AFP

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: